Find below recently published Ottawa decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.
Family Matters
Lacroix v. Plouffe (2026 ONSC 523)
A property ownership dispute was transferred to Family Court, as the issues of title and unjust enrichment arose from a conjugal relationship, falling under Family Court jurisdiction. The court outlined legal principles and evidence but made no findings of fact, reserving costs for the trial judge.
Justice A. Doyle
Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa v. J.A. et al (2026 ONSC 515)
In a child protection case involving Indigenous children, the Court dismissed the Society’s motion for foster care placement, finding the Mother had addressed safety concerns. The children were returned to her care under a supervision order, emphasizing cultural continuity, family bonds, and the children’s best interests.
Justice M. Smith
Civil Matters
RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al. (2026 ONSC 698)
In a construction lien dispute, the Court refused to dismiss the action for delay but required the plaintiff to post $190,000 as security for costs due to financial instability. The Court also addressed improper use of AI in legal submissions, reserving potential cost consequences.
Justice J. Hooper
Will Murray & Associates v. Nader Fakih (2026 ONSC 657)
In a dispute between a law firm and a former partner, the Court ordered the production of documents despite claims of solicitor-client privilege, finding the documents relevant and within the “circle of privilege,” with safeguards to protect client confidentiality.
Associate Justice I. Kamal
Gebremariam v. Menghesha (2026 ONSC 545)
The Court ruled that an electronic document can be validated as a will under Ontario’s Succession Law Reform Act if it meets the statutory requirements, rejecting the argument that such validation is prohibited by the interplay with the Electronic Commerce Act.
Justice S. Corthorn
The Ottawa Hospital v. Hôpitel Inc. (2026 ONSC 596)
The Court awarded substantial indemnity costs of $99,855 to the applicant, citing the respondent’s inconsistent positions and failure to engage in meaningful settlement discussions, which prolonged litigation unnecessarily.
Justice S. Corthorn
Huismans v. Huismans (2026 ONSC 462)
The Court upheld a consent order requiring a share sale between brothers in a family business dispute, rejecting attempts to alter terms to an asset sale. The Court authorized the sale of assets to third parties after one brother failed to exercise his purchase rights.
Justice S. Kershman Continue reading
